Multiple Olympic athletes expelled after failed drug tests
August 17, 2012
Colombian 400m runner Diego Palomeque has become the latest in a long line of athletes to formally be excluded, banned or disqualified from the 2012 London Olympics after a failed drugs test. Palomeque gave a urine sample that tested positive for testosterone. He has stated that the result was caused by him injecting himself with a homeopathic product that he believed included no banned substances.
“It’s always a sad day when a cheating athlete is caught… the message is very clear: If you’re doping we’re going to catch you,” International Olympic Committee spokesman Mark Adams told the Associated Press before the start of the Games. More than 5,000 blood and urine samples were tested for banned substances at this year’s Olympics, more than any previous games. The testing took place about 20 miles away from the competition sites, at the laboratories of GlaxoSmithKline in the town of Harlow as part of a collaboration between GSK and the Drug Control Center at King’s College London. So far, at least nine other athletes have been expelled from the Olympics due to failing a drug test, either before – or during – the Games. “This is about the integrity of London’s Games,” Olympics minister Hugh Robinson told The Telegraph in January. “Anybody who watches in person or on television wants to know that what they are seeing in front of them is a true and fair contest.” After winning the 100 meters final in Seoul in 1988, a reporter asked the Canadian sprinter, Ben Johnson, what was more precious: a world record or the gold medal? Johnson chose the latter. “Why?” the reporter asked. “Because it’s something nobody can take away from you,” he replied. The message coming from London 2012 organizers this year was, “Yes we can, and we will.” It seems like they fulfilled that promise.]]>You May Also Like
Check out these additional posts from Mind Your Business.
Significance of PBSA Accreditation in Screening
In today’s rapidly evolving business landscape, informed hiring choices are paramount. Opting for a background screening firm that upholds rigorous standards of professionalism and integrity, exemplified by PBSA accreditation, is indispensable amid a plethora of options. What is PBSA Accreditation? PBSA, the governing body setting industry benchmarks for background screening firms, grants accreditation following a…
Read More Why Are Continuous Background Checks in Employee Management Important?
Employee management is a difficult and stressful task for many businesses. But there’s a great tool that keeps workplaces safe, trustworthy, and compliant – ongoing background checks. Let’s take a look at what makes them so helpful, how they work in real life, and why they’re so important for maintaining a secure work environment. What…
Read More 
Choosing the Right Background Check Provider for Continuous Background Checks
With continuous background checks, the importance of selecting the right provider cannot be overstated. The decision to integrate continuous monitoring into an organization’s processes comes with the responsibility of choosing a background check provider that aligns seamlessly with the unique needs and values of the organization. Let’s explore the key considerations in selecting the ideal…
Read More Quality and Precise Results, On Time!
Let us know about your screening needs to get a custom quote. We work with businesses big and small as well as the government. Which means we have a package of solutions for your organization as well.